January 10th, 2018
organic vs. conventional foods – discussion and conclusion
The proposals for substitution of conventional foods with organic foods bear main credibility on the environmental conservation achievements of the alternate farming methods. Though recommended application of chemicals in agriculture may not bear immediate harmful health outcomes; the impact of these on the environmental front is generally appreciated (Trewavas, 2004). In this respect the main barrier to adoption of organic farming practices would relate to whether its alternatives present a feasible solution that does not curtail productivity (Paarlberg, 2009). For proponents of organic farming then conservation measures such as crop rotation and intercropping practices in addition to soil fertility improvement through natural and animal compost could solve the productivity issue (Parrot & Marsden, 2002). However whether such practices can bring about as much productivity as what industrial revolution advancements of conventional farming brought thus enhancing food safety is debatable (Paarlberg, 2009).
Secondly the concerns with switching to organic products has been the quality vis-à-vis the cost of such products. Whereas consumer perception of quality in organic foods has been favorable, experimental results have doubted superiority of these products’ quality over those of conventional alternatives (Cunningham, 2001; Harker, 2004; Jiwan, et al, 2009; Ness, et al., 2010). Such mixed findings then has resulted to concerns over the higher pricing of organic products than conventional ones. Since higher production cost may be attributed to these higher market prices of the organic products (Parrot & Marsden, 2002); the effectiveness of organic farming in providing solution to food shortages in the world may be questionable (Paarlberg, 2009). Such perspectives then imply that organic farming justification may rest in ethical issues.
Consumers concern for ethical production practices may be argued a core driver of rising popularity of organic farming. What however has complicated the ethical debate has been different standards of ethical applications. On the one side; ethical standards based on humane treatment of animals, environmental conservation rating and employment preservation favor organic farming. On the other side ensuring access to food for both the rich and poor has been advanced on empowering the peasant farmers with modern technologies for farming that increase productivity and create additional jobs (Paarlberg, 2009). With these different perspectives the decision to which of the two alternatives is more ethical is only better made with the situation context in mind.
The issues surrounding use of organic foods to replace conventional foods are thus enormous. To evaluate these issues this paper thus intended to assess the benefits related with these on different themes. While the environmental advantages of organic farming have supported organic foods consumption; aspects such as productivity, economics and value of organic the products have not completely supported their consumption. In conclusion, it would thus be worth of notable that both organic and conventional practices offer solutions to different farming needs thus all have a role to play when appropriately regulated.
Azadi, H. & Ho, P. (2010). Genetically modified and organic crops in developing countries: A review of options for food security. Biotechnology Advances, 28(1), 160-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.11.003
Clarke, N., Cloke, P., Barnett, C. & Malpass, A. (2008). The spaces and ethics of organic food. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(3), 219-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.12.008
Cunningham, R. (2001). The organic consumer profile: Not only who you think it is! Retrieved April 30, 2010, from http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/ba3468a2a8681f69872569d60073fde1/5af19126648d543b87256c1a007b80fb/$FILE/organic_profile.pdf
Harker, F. R. (2004). Organic food claims cannot be substantiated through testing of samples intercepted in the marketplace: A horticulturalist’s opinion. Food Quality and Preferences, 15(2), 91-95. DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00035-1.
“Is organic overrated?” (2009, May 23). ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 30, 2010, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090521200017.htm
Jiwan, M. A., Duane, P., O’Sullivan, L., O’Brien, N.M., & Aherne, S. A. (2009). Content and bioaccessibility of carotenoids from organic and non-organic baby foods, Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, [Accepted Manuscript]. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2009.12.014
Ness, M.R., Ness, M., Brennan, M., Oughton, E., Ritson, C. & Ruto, E. (2010). Modelling consumer behavioural intentions towards food with implications for marketing quality low-input and organic food. Food Quality and Preference, 21(1), 100-111. DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.08.012
Paarlberg, R. (2009). The ethics of modern agriculture. Society, 46(1), 4-8. DOI: 10.1007/s12115-008-9168-3
Parrott, N. & Marsden, T. (2002). The real green revolution: Organic and agroecological farming in the South. Canonbury Villas, London: Greenpeace Environmental Trust.
Rigby, D., Young, T & Burton, M. (2001). The development of and prospects for organic farming in the UK. Food Policy, 26(6), 599-613. DOI: 10.1016/S0306-9192(01)00023-9.
Shi-ming, M. & Sauerborn, J. (2006). Review of history and recent development of organic farming worldwide. Agricultural Sciences in China, 5(3), 169-178. DOI: 10.1016/S1671-2927(06)60035-7.
Trewavas, A. (2004). A critical assessment of organic farming-and-food assertions with particular respect to the UK and the potential environmental benefits of no-till agriculture. Crop protection, 23(9), 757-781. DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2004.01.009.