January 10th, 2018
Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk – conclusion
Pressure ulcers is a common condition in aged care environments and presents a challenge to effective care due to its high prevalence and associated costs. The subject of this paper was to review the science behind the use of the Braden Scale focusing on the appropriateness of the tool for use in the care provision for the older adults.
Braden scale strength lies in its simplicity and interrater reliability. Its interrater reliability has been favorably rated, at times being reported to be as high as .99. Validity of the scale however has elicited mixed findings in respect to sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Whereas its sensitivity has been favorably rated in most of the reviewed studies (59% and above), its specificity has been poorly rated (as low as 26%) in various studies especially those comparing it to other risk-assessment tools. Similarly, whereas its negative predictive value appears favorable, its positive predictive value that has been rated in some of the comparative studies to be 37%, appears unfavorable. Accordingly, reinforcing Braden scale with other risk assessment practices would better the process of identifying at-risk individuals to whom the preventative initiatives should be focused.
Ayello, E. A (2007). Predicting pressure ulcer risk. Try This: Best Practices in Nursing Care to Older Adults, 5. Retrieved from http://consultgerirn.org/uploads/File/trythis/try_this_5.pdf
Braden, B. J. & Bergstrom, N. (1994). Predictive validity of Braden scale for pressure sore risk in a nursing home population. Research in Nursing & Health, 17, 459-40.
Capon, A. Pavoni, N., Mastromattei, A. & Di Lallo, D. (2007). Pressure ulcer risk in long-term units: prevalence and associated risks. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58(3), 263-272. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04232.x
De Souza, D. M. S. T., Santos, V. L. C. G., Iri, H. K., & Oguri, M. Y. S (2010). Predictive validity of the Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk in elderly residents of long-term care facilities. Geriatric Nursing, 31(2), 95-104.
Defloor, T. & Grypdonck, M. F. H. (2005). Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(3), 373-382, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01058.x
Frantz, R. A. (2004). Evidence-based protocol: prevention of pressure ulcers. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 30(2), 4-11.
Kottner, J. & Dassen, T. (2008). An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45, 1501-1511. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.02.007
Predictive value theory (n.d.). retrieved from http://www.medicine.uiowa.edu/path_handbook/Appendix/Chem/pred_value_theory.html
Seongsook, J., Ihnsook, J & Younghee, L. (2004). Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41, 199-204. doi:10.1016/S0020-7489(03)00135-4.
Thomas, D. R. (2001). Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: What works? What doesn’t? Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 68(8), 704-722. Retrieved from http://xn--lceras-oya.net/publicaciones/Thomas801.pdf
VandenBosch, T, Montoye, C., Satwicz, M. Durkee-Leonard, & Boylan-Lewis (1996). Predictive validity of the Braden scale and nurse perception in identifying pressure ulcer risk. Applied Nursing Research, 9(2), 80-86.
Vap, P. W. & Dunaye, T. (2000). Pressure ulcer risk assessment in long-term care nursing. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 26(6):37-45