January 10th, 2018
Review of the No Child Left Behind Act (2001) – conclusion
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 has various impacts on families, through provisions that deal with parental involvement in schools and funding of programs to support minority groups and enhance diversity in the educational system. For instance, the Act provides for family support and responsibilities, family membership and stability, family involvement and interdependence, family partnership and empowerment, family diversity, and vulnerable families. Some of the specific ways through which these are ensured include supporting minority groups such as girls, poor families, disadvantaged children and illiterate children, providing funds for promising education programs and books for enhancing literacy skills, supporting participation of parents in developing, implementing and evaluating education programs, funding counseling programs in schools and addressing the special needs of rural schools and families.
The NCLBA has various implications, both positive and negative on families. On the positive, the Act will increase student enrollment in schools, enhance quality of education, reduce inequity in education, and promote the well-being of the students and the families. On the negative, the Act indirectly discriminates against the minority groups by entrenching a perception that they are less capable than their peers, and increases tensions between teachers and parents when increased parental involvement lead to selfish demands by parents for teachers to provide more attention to their children at the expense of other children. Despite these, the NCLBA of 2001 promises positive implications in the long run especially after the act is fully implemented as envisioned since it would enhance access to education among society thus improving the overall well-being of communities.
Apling, R. N., & Jones, N. (2004). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): Implications of selected provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA): RL31838. Congressional Research Service: Report, 1.
Cooper, M., Rowland, N., McArthur, K., Pattison, S., Karen, C., & Richards, K. (2010). Randomised controlled trial of school-based humanistic counseling for emotional distress in young people: Feasibility study and preliminary indications of efficacy. Child & Adolescent Psychiatry & Mental Health, 4(12), 412-23. doi:10.1186/1753-2000-4-12
Evans, M. P. (2011). Revisiting emotional geographies: Implications for family engagement and education policy in the United States. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 241-255. doi:10.1007/s10833-011-9155-0.
Grace, A., Jethro, O., & Aina, F. (2012). Roles of parent on the academic performance of pupils in elementary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 2(1), 196-201. Retrieved from http://www.hrmars.com/admin/pics/487.pdf
Gruenewald, D. (2007). Oil and water still: How No Child Left Behind limits and distorts environmental education in US schools. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 171-188. doi:10.1080/13504620701284944
Hindin, A. (2010). Linking home and school: Teacher candidates’ beliefs and experiences. School Community Journal, 20(2), 73-90. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index.html
Jones, P. (2011). Utah’s education funding: How do we get dollars into classrooms? Hinckley Journal of Politics, 12, 61-62.
Kyung Eun, J. (2011). Thinking inside the box: Interrogating No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 8(1), 99-121.
Lee, J. (2010). Trick or treat: New ecology of education accountability system in the USA. Journal of Education Policy, 25(1), 73-93. doi:10.1080/02680930903377423
McLaughlin, C. (2008). Emotional well-being and its relationship to schools and classrooms: A critical reflection. British Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 36(4), 353-366, doi:10.1080/03069880802364486
McMahon, M. (2009). Parent involvement in schools. Parent Involvement in the Schools — Research Starters Education, 1-7.
No Child Left Behind ACT (NCLB) of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
Schifter, L. (2011). High school graduation of students with disabilities: How long does it take? Exceptional Children, 77(4), 409-422.
Suldo, S. M., Friedrich, A. A., White, T., Farmer, J., Minch, D., & Michalowski, J. (2009). Teacher support and adolescents’ subjective well-being: A mixed-methods investigation. School Psychology Review, 38(1), 67-85.
Tveit, A. (2009). A parental voice: parents as equal and dependent – rhetoric about parents, teachers, and their conversations. Educational Review, 61(3), 289-300. doi:10.1080/00131910903045930
Wright, W. E., & Li, X. (2008). High-stakes math tests: How No Child Left Behind leaves newcomer English language learners behind. Language Policy, 7(3), 237-266. doi:10.1007/s10993-008-9099-2
Wyrick, A. J., & Rudasill, K. (2009). Parent involvement as a predictor of teacher-child relationship quality in third grade. Early Education & Development, 20(5), 845-864. doi:10.1080/10409280802582803